Model reference

Concept 4G.1 Antenna and Link Budget

Conducted-power and EIRP semantics, shared antenna evaluation, explicit link-budget terms, reference-pattern behavior, diagnostics, and compatibility evidence.

Concept 4G.1 makes A.T.O.M's antenna and link-budget semantics explicit while preserving the existing compatibility profiles by default. It is a contract foundation, not a full beamforming, receiver, or channel-model implementation.

Audit conclusion

The pre-change audit is preserved in concept-4g1-antenna-audit.md, with machine- readable compatibility evidence in concept-4g1-pre-change-baseline.json. The existing implementation treated tx_power_dbm as conducted power and antenna_gain_dbi as absolute TX gain, then applied relative pattern loss, system loss, calibration, and propagation loss. Its eirp_dbm-named value was actually an effective transmit term that already included system loss and calibration. Receiver gain and polarization mismatch were not represented and therefore were implicitly 0 dBi and 0 dB.

The compatibility sector presets use one hard beam for both ray emission and eligibility. ideal-sector and omni have zero relative attenuation; cosine-sector uses the existing capped quadratic attenuation. The panel vertical presets use the same capped quadratic form around the geometric depression angle. Mechanical and electrical tilt were already summed by the analytic path, but their coordinate/sign convention was not part of the API contract.

The authoritative signed ledger is:

P_rx = P_tx_conducted
     + G_tx_boresight
     - A_tx_pattern
     + G_rx
     - L_system
     - L_polarization
     + calibration
     - L_propagation
     - L_building

The building term is zero when the selected outdoor path crosses no footprint wall events; the legacy wall-event, building-entry, or diagnostic calculation may populate it. Propagation loss is produced by the selected propagation model; antenna code does not contain UMa or FSPL equations. The implementation exposes the intermediate EIRP values:

EIRP_boresight   = P_tx_conducted + G_tx_boresight
EIRP_directional = EIRP_boresight - A_tx_pattern

System loss, polarization loss, and calibration remain separate signed ledger terms. The historical eirp_dbm/EIRPDBm field remains available as an effective-transmit compatibility alias (EIRP_boresight - L_system + calibration); it is not conducted power and is not the new boresight EIRP.

Field contract

Field Contract
tx_power_dbm Conducted transmitter output before antenna gain; default compatibility value is 30 dBm.
tx_antenna_gain_dbi Preferred absolute TX boresight gain.
antenna_gain_dbi Stable legacy alias for the absolute TX boresight gain; both names are normalized on responses.
tx_pattern_attenuation_db Non-negative relative attenuation from boresight, never another gain.
rx_antenna_gain_dbi Scalar receiver gain, added exactly once; default is 0 dBi. No receiver orientation or receiver pattern is inferred.
system_loss_db Aggregate non-propagation implementation loss such as feeder, connector, or implementation margin. It does not include pattern, propagation, building, or polarization loss.
polarization_loss_db Explicit deterministic mismatch loss, subtracted exactly once; default is 0 dB. It is not inferred from antenna names or randomized.
calibration_offset_db Global deterministic prediction correction; positive values raise predicted received power. It is not antenna gain or measured EIRP.
propagation_loss_db Loss returned by the selected propagation model.
building_loss_db Explicit legacy wall-event, building-entry, or diagnostic loss when applicable; otherwise zero.

The API accepts both TX gain field names for migration safety. The frontend uses the preferred name when available and emits both aliases for compatibility. The new receiver and polarization fields are optional and default to zero, so an old profile reproduces its previous numerical interpretation without a silent receiver gain or polarization penalty.

Existing analytic pattern contracts

All pattern evaluation goes through EvaluateAntennaLink and EvaluateAntennaPattern in backend-go/raytracer/antenna_evaluator.go. Absolute gain is supplied by the profile; the evaluator returns relative attenuation and eligibility only.

Pattern Relative attenuation Eligibility and limitations
ideal-sector 0 dB Hard eligible inside the configured horizontal beam; no sidelobe or backlobe.
cosine-sector min(30, 12 * (abs(offset)/(beam_width/2))²) dB Same hard beam eligibility; the formula is an analytic planning preset.
omni 0 dB Full-azimuth eligibility; no elevation-dependent receiver or hardware pattern.
flat 0 dB vertical attenuation Horizontal behavior comes from the selected horizontal preset.
panel-10deg min(30, 12 * (vertical_offset/10)²) dB Analytic vertical cut; no array factor.
panel-20deg min(30, 12 * (vertical_offset/20)²) dB Analytic vertical cut; no array factor.

For analytic patterns, horizontal and vertical attenuation are added as relative terms and capped by their existing per-cut limit. The compatibility hard beam remains a geometric eligibility gate; an outside-sector ray is not converted into a finite sidelobe contribution.

Reference single-element pattern

3gpp-single-element is an optional, non-default reference pattern based on 3GPP TR 38.901 V19.4.0, §7.3, Table 7.3-1. The reference uses the documented 65° phi_3dB/theta_3dB cut parameters and a 30 dB maximum attenuation cap; with the table's quadratic 12 * (offset/parameter)² form, the 3 dB point is at a 32.5° offset. Horizontal and vertical relative losses are combined with min(30 dB, A_horizontal + A_vertical). It evaluates finite attenuation over the full azimuth, including rear directions, and therefore does not use the compatibility hard-sector gate.

This is deliberately a bounded single-element shape. It is not a 3GPP array model, beamforming/codebook model, MIMO model, measured/vendor diagram, sidelobe database, frequency-interpolated hardware pattern, or validated 140 GHz antenna model. The configured absolute TX gain remains the user's antenna assumption and is not derived from the reference cut.

No tabulated-pattern upload or interpolation contract is exposed in 4G.1. A future tabulated foundation must define bounded numeric samples, boresight normalization, sign/range validation, periodic azimuth handling, linear interpolation, duplicate rejection, and explicit horizontal/vertical combination before it becomes a user-facing option.

Coordinate and tilt conventions

  • Azimuth is degrees clockwise from north, normalized to [0, 360).
  • orientation_deg is added to the request/tower base azimuth.
  • A link's horizontal offset is the signed shortest difference between its bearing and the effective antenna azimuth.
  • Ground distance is the horizontal transmitter-to-receiver distance used by the existing analytic vertical calculation.
  • The receiver depression angle is atan2(antenna_height - receiver_height, ground_distance).
  • Vertical offset is depression_angle - (mechanical_downtilt + electrical_downtilt).
  • Positive mechanical downtilt points the boresight downward toward the receiver plane. Mechanical and electrical tilt remain separate fields even though current deterministic patterns use their sum; no electrical-array beam steering is implied.

Shared integration and diagnostics

The shared evaluator is used by direct propagation, segmented rays, coverage surfaces, network/optimization scoring, interference carrier formation, building-entry outdoor facade links, and the isolated path-profile and diffraction diagnostics. Propagation receives the evaluated directional TX and receiver terms, then returns model-specific path loss. This prevents each consumer from implementing a different gain, tilt, or beam rule.

Inspectable response ledgers use RFLinkBudgetTerms and include:

tx_power_dbm
tx_antenna_gain_dbi / antenna_gain_dbi
boresight_eirp_dbm
tx_pattern_attenuation_db
directional_eirp_dbm
rx_antenna_gain_dbi
system_loss_db
polarization_loss_db
calibration_offset_db
propagation_loss_db
building_loss_db
received_power_dbm

The Path Profile panel shows the signed ledger without dumping pattern tables. Ray, interference, building-entry, and diffraction responses expose the ledger where the corresponding result has a link-level diagnostic. Diffraction stays diagnostic-only under the Concept 4F.2 boundary and never feeds canonical network RF, surfaces, interference, optimization, or building-entry service classification.

Independent fixtures and compatibility evidence

antenna_evaluator_test.go uses expected values calculated in the tests rather than calling the production evaluator to generate fixtures. It covers:

  • conducted power plus absolute gain and the separate boresight/directional EIRP ledger;
  • system-loss, calibration, receiver-gain, and polarization-loss signs;
  • preferred/legacy TX gain aliases and normalized wire output;
  • analytic cosine, ideal-sector, omni, hard-edge, and cap behavior;
  • positive mechanical downtilt and vertical panel alignment;
  • 3GPP reference boresight, horizontal 3-dB point, rear direction, combined attenuation/cap, and full-azimuth behavior;
  • propagation carrying the same signed antenna ledger.

The pre-change canonical compatibility artifact records the six-cell Ankara 28 GHz run, representative 2.6/28 GHz links, surface/interference/building entry counts, height audit, optimization scores, recommended azimuth tuple, Pareto size, and runtime. The gated post-change canonical compatibility run reproduces the same legacy-profile values: baseline score 33.7894, optimized score 41.1715, optimized azimuths [70, 20, 130, 160, 290, 110], and Pareto frontier size 6. The new reference pattern is opt-in and is compared separately in the pattern comparison artifact; it is not tuned or made the silent default.

Scope and deferred work

4G.1 does not add receiver thermal-noise-derived sensitivity, modulation/coding, CQI/MCS, throughput, arrays, massive MIMO, beamforming codebooks, dynamic beam selection, UE orientation, stochastic polarization, fast fading, Doppler, scheduling, adjacent-channel effects, or optimizer objectives for antenna choice. The existing 140 GHz profile remains research-only and may use the compatibility analytic presets; this reference cut does not validate sub-THz hardware.

Concept 4G.2 can build on this contract for more realistic beam/array and receiver/channel behavior. It must retain the explicit term ledger and avoid reinterpreting conducted power, absolute gain, or calibration as one another.